Legal Opinion

Claim of Blumenfeld v. Reefer-Galler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by Reefer-Galler and its carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. On March 20, 1950 the claimant was employed to demonstrate and sell, at R. H. Macy & Co., certain mothene products manufactured by ReeferGaller. Her contract stated she was to be hired by Maey’s as an employee of Macy’s who was to pay her salary which with an additional 12% to cover workmen’s compensation, etc., was to be chargeable to Reefer. The claimant’s *991work exposed her to products containing paradiehlorobenzene. Shortly after starting this work she began to feel uncomfortable in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Cummings v. Tenneco Chemicals DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API