Legal Opinion

Hoeffner v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard J. Fried, J.

Motion sequence numbers 002 and 003 are consolidated for disposition in accordance with the following decision and order. In motion sequence number 002, defendants move for an order disqualifying Douglas Wigdor, Esq. and the law firm of Thompson Wigdor & Gilly LLP (TWG) from continuing to act as plaintiffs counsel in this action. In motion sequence number 003, plaintiff moves for leave to submit new evidence in opposition to defendants’ motion to disqualify, and, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, for an award of attorney’s fees and costs in connection with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jamaica Public Service Co. v. AIU InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Reichenbaum v. Reichenbaum & Silberstein, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Waehner v. Northwest Bay Partners, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re Town & Country Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API