Legal Opinion

Young v. Pyle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 12, 1967No. H-115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLS, Chief Judge.

This negligence action was formerly dismissed under Section 45.19(1), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.,1 for failure of the plaintiff-appellee to take action therein for a period of more than one year. It was reinstated, however, on petition of plaintiff-ap-pellee and thereafter final judgment was entered in her favor, hence this appeal in which the defendant-appellant’s sole contention is that the trial court was not authorized on the showing made by plaintiff to reinstate the cause. We agree with the chancellor and affirm.

The facts are:

On April 5, 1961, final judgments were…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. Adams Engineering Co. v. Construction Products Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1963
  3. Dobson v. CrewsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Sudduth Realty Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  5. Young v. PyleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Owens v. Ken's Paint and Body ShopDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Henry Stiles, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. Pierce v. HelzNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Manteiga v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  5. Wells v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API