Legal Opinion

Walker v. Walker

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 2, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] Karen Walker appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court (Bidde-ford, Janelle, J.) modifying her ex-husband’s child support obligation, in which the court concluded that Joseph Walker’s one-time severance payment from his former employer does not fall within the statutory definition of “gross income” contained in 19-A M.R.S.A. § 2001(5)(A) (Supp.2004). We conclude that the Legislature intended to include lump sum severance pay within the definition of gross income. Accordingly, we must vacate the court’s judgment and remand for further child support calculations.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charlton v. Town of OxfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Davis v. Scott Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Town of Ogunquit v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Department of Human Services v. MontySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carolan v. BellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  2. Teele v. West-HarperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Arsenault v. ArsenaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Darcy L. Howard v. Patrick S. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
  5. In re the Marriage of BranchCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API