Legal Opinion

Humbert v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1996No. 18S04-9602-CV-153PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

An Indiana statute aimed at expediting admission of blood tests in paternity cases conflicts with the Indiana Rules of Evidence and thus would normally be void. We have decided to assent to the statute.

During a trial to establish the paternity of her child, Kristy Lynn Smith testified that Tormy L. Humbert, Jr. was the father. Humbert and Smith had one sexual encounter nine months before the child's birth. A court-ordered blood test established a 99.97 percent probability that Humbert is the biological father of the child. Smith had sexual relations with two other men…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Humbert v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. McEwen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Stonger v. SorrellIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Nasser v. St. Vincent Hospital & Health ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Morgan County v. FergusonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API