Legal Opinion
Friedman v. D'Antoni
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 11, 1975PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerlihy, P. J.
It is not disputed that in December of 1974, each of the pétitioners was duly appointed to the position of workmen’s compensation referee to fill positions for which appropriations had been made in the 1974-1975 Budget. Thereafter, the Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Boárd caused each of the petitioners to be served with a notice that their positions were being abolished as of January 22, 1975. The said notice recited that the positions were being abolished pursuant to an oral order of the Division of the Budget. It is alleged in the brief on behalf of the respondents that on January…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Young v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 6New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Collins v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Matter of Sullivan v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Foster v. HurdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Blyn v. BartlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Ball v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Cohen v. Daughters of Sarah Nursing Home Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- City of New York v. New York State Division of the BudgetNew York Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.