Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Ladell Sardin
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1990No. 89-6189PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Michael Sardin appeals his sentence, contending that information was used in sentencing him in violation of his Fifth Amendment rights and that the guideline range was erroneously computed. We affirm in part and reverse in part, and we remand for resentencing.
I
Michael Sardin and four co-defendants, Oscar St. Julian, Kelvin Davis, Kevin Harris, and Marcus Denton all were involved in a plan to ship cocaine from California to Oklahoma City from November 1988 to early 1989. Approximately four shipments of cocaine were made to Oklahoma for sale in furtherance of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Candi Ryder v. The City of Topeka and Michael MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Gregory J. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Nina C. Neu v. Frank Grant and Lorna Marie Grant, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Ronnie HornCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Oscar Marnell St. Julian, Ii, A/K/A Davion WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Buddy Lee GoddardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.