Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1989No. 8818SC1295PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Although defendant entered a guilty plea to both charges for possession of a firearm by a felon and habitual felon, he preserved his appeal under G.S. 15A-979(b) from the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence of the seizure of the gun from his person and his statement to police officers that he had a gun. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the gun and his statement were obtained through an unlawful search and seizure, thereby violating his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GuyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BeveridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. ArtisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API