Commonwealth v. Drewnowski
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtFlannery, J.
A Superior Court jury found the defendant guilty of unarmed robbery, G. L. c. 265, § 19(6).1 On appeal, the defendant contends that the trial judge erred twice (1) in not instructing the jury on the lesser included offenses of larceny from the person of another, G. L. c. 266, § 25(6), and assault with intent to rob, G. L. c. 265, § 20; and (2) in not allowing his motion for a required finding of not guilty of unarmed robbery. We conclude that the denial of the motion for a required finding and the lack of an instruction on assault with intent to *688rob were not error. However, the judge’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. AmiraultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. VanderpoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. ShelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PorroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. DonlanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. St. PeterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BlevinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.