Legal Opinion
State v. Madrid
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1976No. 3496 and 3505PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
Appellants, Jerri Lynn Madrid and her husband, Jim James Madrid, were found guilty of second degree burglary and both were sentenced to confinement for not less than three nor more than five years. A timely appeal was filed by each of them.
Their cases were ordered consolidated for purposes of appeal. This- Court assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
We are asked by both appellants to answer the following questions on appeal:
1. Were the defendants placed in double jeopardy?
2. Were the defendants improperly convicted of burglary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. VillavicencioArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. HuttonArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755Arizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. LoukWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MahoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ParkerArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. Van DykeArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.