Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mississippi County v. City of Osceola

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 2017No. CV-17-123Published

1DissentJosephine Linker Hart, Justice

Ini respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Act 81 of 1901, which establishes two separate judicial districts in Mississippi County, precludes Mississippi County from financing a new Mississippi County courthouse to be located in Blythe-ville, Arkansas. Section 20 of Act 81 provides,

That all revenue accruing to the county from the sale of forfeited state and county lands, liquor and ferry license, and from all other sources whatever, shall be used for the exclusive benefit of the district in which such revenue shall arise.

Section 20, 1901 Ark. Acts at 144. The majority…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Ozark Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  2. Arms. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. Agape Church, Inc. v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Woolard v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Williams v. Arkansas County Courthouse Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API