Legal Opinion

Brown v. Saucerman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1957No. 29,489Published

1Concurrence 1

Concurring Opinion

Achor, J.

I concur in the result reached in the opinion written by Judge Bobbitt, but for a different reason. Contrary to that opinion, for reasons hereinafter set out at length, I am of the opinion that the evidence most favorable to appellee was sufficient to support a verdict and judgment based upon wanton or wilful misconduct. However, I concur in the result of that opinion because I believe that the court committed reversible error by admitting certain improper and prejudicial evidence over the objection of the appellant.

A brief statement regarding the nature of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Emmert.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. LillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Pierce v. ClemensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Brown v. SaucermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Becker v. StraterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Meyer v. CulleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API