Brown v. Saucerman
Indiana Supreme Court
1Concurrence 1
Concurring Opinion
Achor, J.
I concur in the result reached in the opinion written by Judge Bobbitt, but for a different reason. Contrary to that opinion, for reasons hereinafter set out at length, I am of the opinion that the evidence most favorable to appellee was sufficient to support a verdict and judgment based upon wanton or wilful misconduct. However, I concur in the result of that opinion because I believe that the court committed reversible error by admitting certain improper and prejudicial evidence over the objection of the appellant.
A brief statement regarding the nature of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Emmert.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin v. LillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Pierce v. ClemensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Brown v. SaucermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Becker v. StraterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
- Meyer v. CulleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.