Legal Opinion
In Re Sydney Floersheim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1963No. 18313_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
This court heretofore issued an order to show cause why the respondent herein, Sydney Floersheim, should not be adjudged in criminal contempt, and punished, for a violation of this court’s order. 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). The proceeding was instituted at the request of the Federal Trade Commission. The decree herein involved was the final decree (filed December 29, 1959 by this court in its Cause No. 16328, entitled Mitchell S. Mohr, et al., Petitioners, vs. Federal Trade Commission, Respondent) enforcing the order to cease and desist theretofore issued by the Federal Trade…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Western Fruit Growers, Inc. v. GotfriedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. GoldfineDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
- Duffy v. BrodyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1957
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Joseph S. BukowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- In Re Darwin Charles BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- In Re Robert T. Gustafson, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Sydney N. Floersheim, an Individual Trading and Doing Business as Floersheim Sales Company and National Research Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.