Legal Opinion

Stanfield v. Neill

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Guadalupe. Tried below before the Hon. Henry Maney. There is no occasion for a statement, of the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

We have not hitherto, nor do we now recognize the law limiting the time, after presentment and rejection, to the commencement of suits against executors and administrators, as properly a statute of limitations, suspended by the present Constitution.

It is one of the regulations of our probate system, which imposes the loss of the claim, if the party neglects to bring his suit within the time required to facilitate the settlement of the estates of deceased persons.

The reason which operated upon the minds of the framers of our Constitution could not have influenced this case. The claim was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poole v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Jaye v. WheatCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Poole v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API