Farmers Production Credit Ass'n v. McFarland
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentCarter, Justice
I dissent.
The majority opinion unnecessarily and without articulating a single policy ground supporting its result significantly retracts the protection previously afforded mortgagors under our redemption laws. It is particularly unfortunate that this occurs at a time when, because of prevailing economic conditions, mortgagors are particularly in need of such protection.
There are two issues presented by this appeal: (1) whether, when the mortgagor’s assignee redeems from the sale on foreclosure of a senior mortgage during the six-month period where such right of redemption is exclusive, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kramer v. RebmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Cooper v. MaurerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Mayer v. Farmers' BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Tirrill v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Stoddard v. ForbesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.