Legal Opinion

Buck v. Little & Nance

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided October 15, 1852PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In error from the circuit court of Holmes county; Hon. Robert C. Perry, judge. The opinion of the court contains the facts of the case. cited and commented on 2 How. 769 ; Hutch. Code, 642, 463, art. 5; Chitty on Bills, 207; lb. 318; lb. 258, 259; Anderson v. Tarpley, 6 S. & M. 507.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yerger

This was an action of assumpsit against the drawer of an inland bill of exchange. The bill was not protested; but it was proved that it was drawn without authority, and that the *464drawer had no right to expect that it would be accepted or paid. On this evidence, the jury found a verdict against the defendant for the principal and interest of the bill. This verdict was right. It appears from a bill of exceptions, that after the verdict, upon motion of the plaintiff, the court added five per cent, to the amount of the verdict, and gave judgment for the amount of the verdict, and the five per…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fiore v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kelsey v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  3. Collins v. CarterMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Printing Industry v. BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API