Jarret v. Andrews
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 60 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM M’CRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, sec. 7, art. 2, chap. 48, 1 Stanton, 578. 6 B. Monroe, 295, Withers v. Hickman. 2 Story’s Equity, section 1857, page 791. CITED Revised Statutes, “ Guardian and ’Ward,” 1 Stanton, 578. Manuscript Opinion, December, 1853, Coil v. Howard. 7 B. Monroe, 573, Richardson, &c. v. Linnev. 4 B. Monroe, 320, Bybee V. Thorp and wife. 4 Dana, 631, Irvine v. McDowell. 6 Johnson’s Chancery Reports, 367.…
Read the full summary
Case 60 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM M’CRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, sec. 7, art. 2, chap. 48, 1 Stanton, 578. 6 B. Monroe, 295, Withers v. Hickman. 2 Story’s Equity, section 1857, page 791. CITED Revised Statutes, “ Guardian and ’Ward,” 1 Stanton, 578. Manuscript Opinion, December, 1853, Coil v. Howard. 7 B. Monroe, 573, Richardson, &c. v. Linnev. 4 B. Monroe, 320, Bybee V. Thorp and wife. 4 Dana, 631, Irvine v. McDowell. 6 Johnson’s Chancery Reports, 367. 15 B. Monroe, 591, Johnson’s heirs v. Chandler’s heirs.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LINDSAY
delivered the opinion oe the court.
The appellant, Jarret, filed his petition in equity in the McCracken Circuit Court on the 8th day of November, 1866, in which he stated that in the year 1862 he was appointed and qualified as the statutory guardian of Kate P. Pool, a young lady bordering upon womanhood; that his ward owned and possessed unimproved lands and town lots of the value of several thousand dollars, but that the same yielded no rents nor profits whatever. Also, that at the time of his appointment his said ward “ was in need of clothing of all kinds for her comfort' and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Dixon v. HosickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Commonwealth ex rel. Lee v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Boyd v. HawkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
- Campbell v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881