Legal Opinion

Cormack v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 11, 1972No. 52392PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*826We find no error of law in the Court of Appeal judgment.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the writ should issue. The policy provision as interpreted by the court of appeal gives a benefit for dental treatment that is largely illusory.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. New York Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Hill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Armstrong v. Land & Marine Applicators, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Matherne v. Prudential Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Touchstone v. Land & Marine Applicators, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API