Legal Opinion

Brown v. Nichols

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 15, 1885Published

1Opinion of the Court

McAdam, Ch. J.

An unverified offer to allow judgment, ■signed by the defendant’s attorney, is a nullity, and the plaintiff waives nothing by retaining it and proceeding in the action (Code, § 740; 14 Hun, 387; 78 N. Y. 586; 17 Hun, 515; 56 How. Pr. 247). The offer is not amendable (14 Abb. N. C. 96), nor is it in any ease effectual unless served at least ten days before the action is reached for trial (2 Abb. N. C. 90; 10 Hun, 111; 7 How. Pr. 161). If, after making the offer, the defendant pleads a counter-claim which is proved and allowed on the trial, its amount will Be considered as part of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bathgate v. . HaskinNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Tompkins v. . IvesNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Pomeroy v. Hulin & BeebeNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Pike v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Riggs v. . WaydellNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API