Legal Opinion

People v. Richiee

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1933No. Docket No. 2391Published

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

By an amended information defendant was accused not only of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon, but as well of theretofore having been convicted of a felony. On arraignment, he admitted the truth of the latter charge, but pleaded not guilty as to the former. Following his conviction of the charge of assault with a deadly weapon, he has appealed from the ensuing judgment and from an order by which his motion for a new trial was denied.

Appellant presents two points for reversal of the judgment : First, that the verdict of the jury was not sustained by the evidence; and secondly, that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. KnothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. People v. FontesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API