Legal Opinion

Satterfield v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1850PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Perquimans County, at the Spring Term 1850, his Honor Judge Ellis presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtPeaesoh, J.

The action was for a breach of a contract for hiring. One of the terms of which was (as the plaintifF alleged,) that “the negro should not be employed at a fishery or sent by water.”

The plaintifF read in evidence a paper writing, purporting to contain the terms of hiring, one of which was, that the negro should not be employed at a fishery or sent by water, and proved by several witnesses that the paper was read aloud by the crier, before the hiring commenced.

The defendant called several witnesses, who swore that no such paper was read in their hearing, and that the crier, just as the bidding…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kennell v. BoyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API