Legal Opinion

Lincoln Vitrified Paving & Pressed Brick Co. v. Buckner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1894No. 5609PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J. cited: Wood-bury v. Obear, 7 Gray [Mass.], 467; Williams v. Brown, 28 O. St., 547. cited : Shaber v. St. Paul R. Co., 28 Minn., 108; State v. Manchester & L. R. Co., 52 N. H., 528; Foxworthy v. City of Hastings, 25 Neb., 133.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

Clarissa Buckner, an infant five years of age, brought this suit by her next friend against plaintiff in error, alleging in brief that on or about the 29th day of July, 1889, the brick company unlawfully and negligently deposited on K street, in Lincoln, hot and burning coal, cinders, and ashes dangerous to the traveling public, and that the plaintiff, while walking upon that street, without negligence upon her part, stepped upon said coals, cinders, and ashes, whereby she was severely and dangerously burned in her feet and limbs. The answer was in effect a general denial. There was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howell, Jewett & Co. v. Graff, Murray & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. Lincoln Traction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Landis & Schick v. WattsNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API