McKinnon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WOLF, Judge.
Appellants assert that the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress physical evidence. They claim that the police officer who stopped the vehicle they were traveling in did not have a founded suspicion to justify an investigatory stop. We find that the officer had a founded suspicion that appellants had participated in the robbery which had occurred 14 minutes prior to the stop in question. We affirm.
Officer Rabón of the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office was responding to a report of a robbery at a liquor store at approximately 9:00 p.m. While he was headed for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gipson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Steele v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cobb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994