Legal Opinion
Craig v. Provo City
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided June 4, 2015No. 20131074-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOOMEY, Judge:
T1 Elizabeth Craig, Brady Harper, and Nu Lite Sales, LLC (collectively, Appellants) challenge the district court's decision to dismiss their action against Provo City after concluding that Utah Code section 78B-2-111 (the Savings Statute) does not apply to claims brought under the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah (the UGIA). See Utah Code Ann. $ 68G-7-101 (LexisNexis 2011). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
T2 Pursuant to the UGIA, Craig and Harper filed a notice of claim against Provo City on February 16, 2011, and Nu Lite Sales filed a similar…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Hall v. Utah State Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Rushton v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Hi-Country Property Rights Group v. EmmerUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Anderson v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Craig v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Craig v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Craig v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016