Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Fazio

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 9, 1959No. Gen. 10,236PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE REYNOLDS

delivered the opinion of the conrt.

This is a suit to recover $5,000 paid by the plaintiff to the defendant as part of the purchase price for the Benld Bowling Alley. Defendant showed the alleys and equipment to the plaintiff and according to the testimony of the plaintiff, represented that the equipment was “just like new.” Plaintiff took possession of the bowling alley and about one month later began to have trouble with the equipment. An examination showed all the alleys with considerable wear, some had wooden plugs in them, and further examination disclosed that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Kunstman v. NaganoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Richman Chemical Co. v. LowenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  3. Harris v. AnnunzioIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hayes v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Gage v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gribben v. Interstate Motor Freight System Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. Nieberding v. Phoenix Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  3. Backlund v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  4. Dowling v. JensenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. Lincoln Casualty Co. v. Vic & Mario's Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API