Legal Opinion

Margulis v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 3, 1930PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank, J.

Action by plaintiff, respondent here, against defendants, National Enameling & Stamping Company and Justus W. Pfaff, to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff on May 9, 1925, as a result of being struck by an automobile driven by defendant Pfaff. Verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $27,500. Defendant, National Enameling & Stamping Company appealed.

The case was submitted to the jury under the humanitarian rule.

No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence to establish prima-facie that plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the negligence of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  4. Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Pyyny v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. American National InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Fortner v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. O'Brien v. RindskopfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Barnes Ex Rel. Barnes v. Real Silk Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. McNatt v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API