Di Vecchio v. Luchsinger
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment for plaintiff, and to direct judgment for defendant. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an action for damages for false and fraudulent representations made to induce the execution of a lease. The appeal is from the judgment in favor of plaintiff, taken more than sixty days after its entry, and from an order denying defendants’ motion to vacate the judgment and to direct the entry of a judgment in favor of defendants.
On July 27, 1906, the defendants, George H. Luchsinger, Alvina L. Goodrich, Rose A. Buckingham and their sister Annie L. Summerhayes, since deceased, leased to the plaintiff certain premises on Golden Gate avenue in San Francisco, consisting of three flats,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McAulay v. MoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914