Legal Opinion

High v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1913No. Civil No. 1302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. Fred Sutter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an action in the nature of a writ of quo warranto instituted, on the relation of W. G. Gilmore, county attorney for Cochise county, against appellant, M. C. High. It is alleged that High was elected, at the regular November, *4311908, election, justice of the peace of precinct No. 2 of Cochise' county for the term of two years from January 1, 1909; that he qualified- as such justice of the peace, and performed the duties thereof until January 1, 1913; that on September 3,1912, the board of supervisors of Cochise county redistricted said county into justice precincts to take effect and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Proulx v. GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Price v. AndersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ahearn v. BaileyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Barrows v. GarveyArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Sweeney v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Brooks v. KerbyArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hellman v. MarquardtArizona Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API