Legal Opinion

Ray v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 9, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*237 ORDER

The petitioner, James Earl Ray, presents a motion in this court seeking (1) permission to reopen his post-conviction proceeding, and (2) the dissolution of the stay previously ordered by this Court prohibiting the inspection and testing of physical evidence. The state has filed an answer in opposition to the petitioner’s motion.

For the reasons stated below, we find that the motion to reopen the petition for post-conviction relief should be denied; however, the motion to dissolve the stay order should be granted.

CASE HISTORY

This case has been the subject of extensive appellate review in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James Earl Ray v. J. H. Rose, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  3. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Darrell Wayne Taylor v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  3. Jerry Ray, of The Estate of James Earl Ray v. State OfCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Ray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Steven Griffin v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API