Legal Opinion
Bialkowski v. Bor. of Ridgefield
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 7, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
118 N.J. Super. 354 (1972)
287 A.2d 479
GENE M. BIALKOWSKI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND GEORGE CALZA, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided February 7, 1972.
Messrs. Okin, Pressler & Shapiro, attorneys for plaintiff.
Mr. Michael L. Scherby, attorney for defendants.
BRESLIN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This matter originally came before the court on an order to show cause why plaintiff was not entitled to relief sought in his verified complaint in lieu of prerogative writs against defendants Borough of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barringer v. MieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Egan v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- In Re Petition of Keogh-DwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Greenfield v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Allgaier v. Township of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Muccio v. CroninNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Smith v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF BERGEN CTYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Roe v. Borough of Upper Saddle RiverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Caldwell v. Township of Rochelle ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- State v. GilfesisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977