Legal Opinion
Anand Nayak, et al. v. Joseph B. Edlow
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 28, 2026No. 3:26-cv-01169Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANAND NAYAK, et al., Case No. 26-cv-01169-EMC (EMC) 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 JOSEPH B. EDLOW, Docket No. 22 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiffs Anand Nayak, Vinod Khatri, and Pratik Sureshbhai Patel are citizens of India 15 who seek lawful permanent residence through the EB-5 immigrant investor program. Each alleges 16 that he has invested at least $800,000 in a new commercial enterprise located in a targeted 17 employment area and has filed a Form I-526E, Immigrant Petition…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.