Stubbs v. Atlanta Cotton-Seed Oil Mills
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarke. Fulton superior court. September term, 1892. The plaintiff excepted to the grant of a nonsuit. He was injured while working at a machine (called the cake-breaker) in the defendant’s mills.
Read the full summary
Action for damages. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarke. Fulton superior court. September term, 1892. The plaintiff excepted to the grant of a nonsuit. He was injured while working at a machine (called the cake-breaker) in the defendant’s mills. The alleged negligence of the defendant was, in allowing the cogs to remain exposed instead of replacing the boxes which originally covered them and which had been worn or broken off; and in failing to turn on the electric lights, whereby the plaintiff' was compelled to work by the dim light of an oil lamp. It appeared from his testimony that he had for…
1Opinion of the Court
*496 Judgment affirmed,.
Westmoreland & Austin a'nd J. E. Warren, for plaintiff'. Abbott & Smith, for defendant.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Cotton-Oil Co. v. GladmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Crown Cotton Mills v. McNallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Pennsylvania Co. v. EbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Ogain v. Imperial Cafe Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Hamby v. Union Paper-Mills Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.