Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Lakeview Loan Servicing LLCThe clerks office is ordered to not accept any further filings until the motion to dismiss is ruled on (see order 40)

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 19, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00182Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 19, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION RAYMOND JOHNSON, § Plaintiff, § § v. § CASE NO. 4:25-CV-182 § LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, § LLC, et al., § Defendants. JUDGE DENA PALERMO’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 Before the Court is Defendants Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC and LoanCare LLC’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 24. The moving Defendants2 argue that all of Plaintiff’s claims “rest on his erroneous theory that Moving Defendants lack standing to foreclose because [they] cannot produce the original Note.” ECF No. 24 at 3. Pro se…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API