Legal Opinion
Brown v. Mortimer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 18, 1968PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
100 N.J. Super. 395 (1968)
242 A.2d 36
FRANK BROWN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
FLORENCE MORTIMER AND SHERRY SCHULTZ VAN DORNICK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 6, 1967.
Decided April 18, 1968.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Robert W. Criscuolo argued the cause for appellant Sherry Schultz Van Dornick (Mr. Robert J. Partlow, on the brief; Messrs. Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys).
Mr. George Y. Schoch argued the cause for appellant Florence Mortimer.
Mr. Sidney P. McCord, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. McCord,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kulbacki v. SobchinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Mahoney v. MinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Fagan v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- State v. GillespieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Branch v. Emery Transportation Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Leslie Blau Co. v. AlfieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Calabrese v. Trenton State CollegeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- State v. HudesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Westphal v. GuarinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.