Canterbury v. Monroe Lange Hardwood Imports Division of MacRose Industries Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The question on which resolution of this appeal turns is whether substituted service of process on the Secretary of State was proper. For the reasons to follow, we are constrained to hold that it was not, even though the defendant admittedly had actual notice and even though we are satisfied that minimum contacts exist between this defendant and the State of North Carolina to permit this State constitutionally to exercise jurisdiction had service been effective.
Before we reach the ultimate issue respecting service and although we bottom our affirmation of the order dismissing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Spartan Equipment Co. v. Air Placement Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Jake Harold Bowman, Philip G. Griffin, A. Donald Brinton and Midland Industries, Inc. v. Curt G. Joa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fraser v. LittlejohnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Harold Lang Jewelers, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Ellison v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Credit Union Auto Buying Serv., Inc. v. Burkshire Props. Grp. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.