Legal Opinion

Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. Kirby

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1932No. 7 Div. 914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

On April 28, 1930, one McCrary owned a Buiek sedan. The appellant, Automobile Insurance Company, had issued what is known as a theft policy covering the automobile. On the date mentioned, in the morning, McCrary parked his car in front of his place of business in Birmingham, gave no one permission to move the car, and about an hour later, returning for his car, found that it had been stolen. On April 30, 1930, the pay roll of the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company was taken by robbers in East Gadsden, and McCrary’s car was later found at the scene of the robbery, and the defendant, Kirby, took…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Kirk v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bruner v. Geneva County Forestry Dept.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Flood v. City National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. People v. StayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API