Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sorrell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 1983No. 2406PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

In June, 1978 appellant William Sorrell was found guilty by a jury of charges of robbery and conspiracy. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 8 to 16 years and this appeal followed. We reverse and remand for a new trial because: 1) 42 Pa.C.S. § 5104(c) pursuant to which the lower court denied appellant’s attempt to waive his right to jury trial, has been declared unconstitutional by our Supreme Court; and 2) certain incriminating statements made by appellant should have been suppressed as being the fruit of an illegal arrest.

Before discussing the circumstances of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. CarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. MossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. NeidigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API