Legal Opinion

United States v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 22, 2005No. 04-40016Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence of Bernard Cunningham. Un ited States v. Cunningham, 117 Fed.Appx. 373 (5th Cir.2005). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See Cunningham v. United States, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2274, 161 L.Ed.2d 1052 (2005). We requested and received supplemental letter briefs addressing the impact of Booker.

In his original appeal to this court, citing Apprendi v. New…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Scott Schirmann CreechCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API