Legal Opinion

Halnon v. Halnon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Debt on an award. Pleas, general issue and Statute of Limitations. Demurrer to the plea of said statute. Heard, June Term, 1882, Taft, J., presiding. Demurrer overruled.

Read the full summary

Debt on an award. Pleas, general issue and Statute of Limitations. Demurrer to the plea of said statute. Heard, June Term, 1882, Taft, J., presiding. Demurrer overruled. The award was a specialty within the meaning of R. L. s. 956. Angelí Lim. p. 90 ; Smith v. Lockwood, 7 Wend. 211; Uodgen v. Rarrindge, 2 Saund. 187 ; Pease v. Roward, 14 Johns. 480 ; Freeman Judg. 32; Smith v. Johnson, 15 East, 213; 12 N. Y. 9. As is well known, a specialty is a writing, sealed and delivered, containing some agreement. And it is equally familiar law that to authorize an agent to execute a specialty his…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Royce, Ch. J.

This was an action of debt on an award under seal. The award was made on the 13th of March, 1874; and the amount awarded to be paid the plaintiff was, by said award,' *322ordered to be paid within four months from its date. The writ in this ease was dated the 25th day of May, 1881, more than six, and less than eight, years after the time had elapsed within which the sum awarded was ordered to be paid. The defendant pleaded the general issue and Statute of Limitations; and the case was heard upon the plaintiff’s demurrer to the plea of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. Central Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Patterson Steel Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API