Legal Opinion
Walker v. Giles
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 6, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. Suit by Edwin Walker, John W. Dorman, Edward J. Dorman, and Mary E. Rex ford against Henry Giles and Catherine Nielsen, copartners trading as Giles & Nielsen Nickel Works. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
[1] The patent in suit alleged to be infringed was issued to Albert P. Olmstead, assignor to Eazelle A. Michael, trustee, May 1, 1906, on application filed December 30, 1905, for “ice cream dipper.” The claim alleged to be infringed reads as follows:
“1. A dipper for plastic material, comprising in combination a handle and howl provided with a hub bearing at the inner end of, and open to, the bowl;’ *826a toothed scraper hub rotatively mounted in said huh bearing, and insertable and removable through the bowl, said hub having a peripheral flange overhanging on the inner side…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wagner Typewriter Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Benbow-Brammer, Mfg. Co. v. StrausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- Benbow-Brammer Mfg. Co. v. StrausU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weber Electric Co. v. Union Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- Gilchrist Co. v. Erie Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Gilchrist Co. v. Erie Specialty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1914