Santos-Sanchez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRADO, Circuit Judge:
This case primarily involves whether defense counsel or a trial judge must inform a criminal defendant of the immigration consequences of a guilty plea. The district court concluded that Jesus Natividad Santos-Sanchez (“Santos-Sanchez”) had failed to establish that his counsel provided ineffective assistance or that his plea was involuntary. For the following reasons, we affirm the ruling of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
Santos-Sanchez has been a legal resident alien of the United States since 2001. On September 6, 2003, Santos-Sanchez drove into a United States Border…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- People v. PequeNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- United States v. Temitope AkinsadeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.