Legal Opinion

United States v. 154 Sacks of Oats

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided October 20, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDOWELL, District Judge.

This is a proceeding for forfeiture of a shipment of sample grade oats, made by the claimants in interstate commerce. The information charges that the oats had been adulterated (1) in that a substance had been mixed with them so as to reduce and injuriously affect their quality; (2) in that wild oats, weed seeds, chaff, and dust were mixed therewith in such manner as that the inferiority of the mixture was concealed; and (3) that the said oats had been misbranded.

The order establishing official grain standards for oats under the Grain Standards Act (see Service and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. 154 Sacks of OatsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1923
  2. United States v. 800 Sacks Barley Mixed OatsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API