Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Dodgson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Frank L. Dodgsbn and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 21st day of October, 1904, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term, overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

This is an action in equity, the plaintiff asking that the defendants be enjoined and restrained from prosecuting in the United States Patent Office, at Washington, D. 0., interference proceedings there pending before the Commissioner of Patents, and from taking any steps whatsoever in said proceedings, or either of them, and from otherwise prosecuting in said Patent Office, or in any foreign country, any application or applications for letters patent of the United States, upon any of the interference claims involved in said proceedings, and also from disclosing to any person or…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guggenheim v. WahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Allison v. Eagle InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Burlingame v. ManchesterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API