Legal Opinion

Redfield v. Abbott Shoe Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 6, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The plaintiff, the holder and payee of a promissory note, brought this action of contract against the defendant, the maker of said note, to collect $1,000, the principal of the note, and interest of $174.18. The note *552was dated December 15, 1951, and due June 15, 1952. This action was commenced by trustee process in which a bank was named as trustee. The trustee answered that, at the time of the service of the writ upon it, it had on its books a credit of $670.36 after deducting $5 in connection with the service of the process upon it, and that its records also disclosed an outstanding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Brooks v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Chandler v. DunlopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Tyler v. Boot & Shoe Workers UnionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. School Committee v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buono v. NardellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Redfield v. Abbott Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Korolick v. DaneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API