Legal Opinion

Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. McKinney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Edward P. McKinney and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of. the county of Broome on the 19th day of August, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Broome Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Houghton, J.:

The plaintiff is a jobber and manufacturing chemist and the defendants were engaged in the drug business. In March,-1906, the defendants gave to the plaintiff a written order for a large quantity of various kinds of perfumes, toilet waters, powders and creams' at specified prices per gross to be delivered monthly for the period of two years.. The various articles were to be put up in particular and specified packages and bottles, branded or labeled with defendants’ name, all of which'the.plaintiff was to furnish ready for retail'. The sachet powder, lavender and Florida waters…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Messmore v. New York Shot & Lead Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Todd v. . GambleNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Parsons v. . LoucksNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. . Templar Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Terminal Central, Inc. v. Henry Modell & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. RIJ PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. v. Ivax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. Goldowitz v. Henry Kupfer & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API