Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Handen
Baltimore City Court
1Opinion of the CourtSoper, J.
(DOBLER and GORTER, JJ., concurring)
This is an action of replevin for the recovery of possession of a sewing machine. The Singer Sewing Machino Company, by nil agreement in writing, *41leased or sold the. machine on January 4, 1917, to the defendant Josie Handen, who promised to make certain monthly payments. Upon her failure to make the payments as agreed the company sought to take back the machine, when it was discovered that Josie Handen laid sold and delivered it to her co-defendant, L. Lowenthal. who had no notice of the terms of the contract by which she omne into possession of the machine…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Murch v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Hurnanen v. NicksaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Cottrell & Sons v. Merchants & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.