Legal Opinion

Pesch v. Gretter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1940No. 27,331PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

The appellant was plaintiff below. After issues were formed, and the plaintiff had introduced his evidence, the defendant moved the court in writing for judgment against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant. There was a memorandum attached to the motion setting out several argumentative reasons why the motion should be sustained. The motion was sustained. The appellant excepted, and judgment was entered for the defendant. The judgment was entered on the 30th day of June, 1938, in the January term of court. There was no motion for a new trial, nor was time granted for the filing of a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hansbrough v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cooper v. Huntington County Community School Corp. Board of TrusteesIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Cooper v. HUNTINGTON CTY. COMM SCH. CORP BD. OF TRUSTEESIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Croxton, Administratrix v. CroxtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Frye v. Gibbs & ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API