Banque Hypothecaire Du Canton De Geneve v. Union Mines, Inc.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SMALKIN, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the plaintiff/eounterdefendant’s (BCG’s) motion in limine to exclude certain evidence as to damages on the counterclaim, as well as the defendant/counter-plaintiff’s (UMI’s) opposition thereto.

At the outset, I agree with UMI’s contention that a motion in limine is not the appropriate procedural vehicle by which to raise these issues. The office of a motion in limine (which is, by the way, not a creature of either the Federal Rules of Evidence or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) is to aid the trial process by enabling the…