Legal Opinion

CLARK v. FARRIS

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 2015No. 114,157PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T0 ORDER

T1 Clark's filings in this Court seek both remedies of appellate jurisdiction and original jurisdiction review of a District Court's order. In the District Court, he sought a writ of habeas corpus to challenge his judgment and sentence in a criminal proceeding and the District Court dismissed his petition.

12 A District Court's order dismissing, or granting, or denying a petition for habeas corpus is not reviewed using this Court's civil appellate jurisdiction when the habeas corpus remedy was used to challenge a previous order of incarceration or commitment in a criminal proceeding.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  3. Tagaban v. City of PelicanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CLARK v. FARRISSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. KNOX v. OKLAHOMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. KNOX v. OKLAHOMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API