Legal Opinion

Joeckel v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 28, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Madison District Court. — W. II. Fai-iey, Judge. Action at law to recover $1,000 on a land contract, which, as plaintiff contends, was stipulated, damages for loss, expense, inconvenience, etc., occasioned by the failure of appellant to perform his part of the contract. There was a trial to the court, without a jury, and judgment for plaintiff for the amount claimed, with interest. Defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

i. vende: place of safe of™eaice: estate: breach. The petition alleged, substantially, that the parties entered into a written contract, January 24, 1913, whereby plaintiff sold to defendant certain lands in Madison County Iowa consisting 205 acres; that defendant has failed to perform his part of contraet; that plaintiff has demanded performance ; that defendant has forfeited to plaintiff the right to recover the sum of $1,000, provided in the contract; and that plaintiff has been to the expense of $50 attorneys’ fees for collecting the same. The contract provides, among other things:

“Said…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Foley v. McKeeganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  2. Selby v. MatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Kelly v. FejervarySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Sanford v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Baily v. BirkhoferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gordon v. PfabSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Independent School District v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Pace v. ZellmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Syndicate Clothing Co. v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Brown v. VerzaniSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API